Evaluation of the OJJDP FY2010 Second Chance Act Juvenile Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects, 5 United States cities, 2010 (ICPSR 37212)

Version Date: Nov 10, 2022

Cite this study |

Principal Investigator(s):
Akiva Liberman, Urban Institute

https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37212.v1

Version V1

Slide tabs to view more

Summary

In response to growing concerns about recidivism and the welfare of youth who return to communities from incarceration, the federal government passed the Second Chance Act (SCA) in 2008 to authorize funding to support the development, implementation, and evaluation of juvenile reentry programs (H.R. 1593, 110th Cong. 2007). Since then, more than 100 juvenile SCA awards have been made to grantees across the U.S. to improve reentry programming and outcomes for youth returning home after placement in juvenile correctional institutions (State Government Justice Center, 2017).

The purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate five FY2010 juvenile SCA grantees who were funded to implement comprehensive reentry programs for high-risk youth, and to provide policymakers, practitioners, and funders with empirical evidence about the degree to which the SCA program effectively reduced recidivism and improved reintegration outcomes for youth offenders, and to inform future comprehensive juvenile reentry efforts.

Specific goals of this study included:

  1. identifying strong sites for an impact evaluation;
  2. assessing the extent to which the sites successfully implemented a comprehensive and integrated model of juvenile reentry for a high-risk, high-needs population;
  3. assessing program operations and adherence to reentry principles;
  4. evaluating the impact of the SCA programs;
  5. determining the cost effectiveness of the SCA programs, and their cost-benefit in terms of crime prevented; and
  6. disseminating evaluation findings to practitioner and researcher audiences.

Citation

Liberman, Akiva. Evaluation of the OJJDP FY2010 Second Chance Act Juvenile Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects, 5 United States cities, 2010. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-11-10. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37212.v1

Export Citation:

  • RIS (generic format for RefWorks, EndNote, etc.)
  • EndNote

Funding

United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice (2012-RY-BX-0013)

Subject Terms

Geographic Coverage

Smallest Geographic Unit

City

Restrictions

Access to these data is restricted. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Restricted Data Use Agreement, specify the reason for the request, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research.

Distributor(s)

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
Hide

Time Period(s)

2010
Hide

Study Purpose

The purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate five FY2010 juvenile Second Chance Act (SCA) grantees who were funded to implement comprehensive reentry programs for high-risk youth, and to provide policymakers, practitioners, and funders with empirical evidence about the degree to which the SCA program effectively reduced recidivism and improved reintegration outcomes for youth offenders, and to inform future comprehensive juvenile reentry efforts.

Specific goals of this study included:

  1. identifying strong sites for an impact evaluation;
  2. assessing the extent to which the sites successfully implemented a comprehensive and integrated model of juvenile reentry for a high-risk, high-needs population;
  3. assessing program operations and adherence to reentry principles;
  4. evaluating the impact of the SCA programs;
  5. determining the cost effectiveness of the SCA programs, and their cost-benefit in terms of crime prevented; and
  6. disseminating evaluation findings to practitioner and researcher audiences.

Study Design

Baseline interviews and 6-month follow up interviews were conducted with youth being released to either the Second Chance Act (SCA) or comparison sites. To be eligible to participate in an interview a youth must have been incarcerated and returning home (or had already returned home) to either the SCA or the comparison site, and have a parent or guardian assent to their participation in the study. All youth were offered a $50 stipend for their participation in the study.

In Oklahoma, the baseline interview was conducted with youth approximately 30 days prior to release from a correctional facility; in VA, negotiation with the Department of Juvenile Justice led to baseline interviews being conducted shortly after a youth was released. Follow-up interviews were conducted between 5 and 8 months following release.

Baseline interviews concerned both the youth's pre-incarceration history as well as the incarceration experience. Follow-up interviews concerned the reentry experience as well as experiences and outcomes during the 6 months following release. Some eligible youth could not be interviewed during the baseline period, but were successfully recruited for the 6-month interview, and one longer comprehensive interview was completed at that time to cover the content of both interviews.

Time Method

Cross-sectional

Universe

Juvenile offenders in Tidewater, VA and Tulsa, OK.

Unit(s) of Observation

Individual

Data Type(s)

Mode of Data Collection

Hide

Original Release Date

2022-11-10

Hide

Weight

The research team recommends users use ATT weight variables in the Oklahoma Admin and Virginia Admin datasets for analysis.

Hide

Notes

  • The public-use data files in this collection are available for access by the general public. Access does not require affiliation with an ICPSR member institution.

  • One or more files in this data collection have special restrictions. Restricted data files are not available for direct download from the website; click on the Restricted Data button to learn more.